Asrock Z490 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z490 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 212
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 772
75% 618 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 111
Parallax 114
99% 116 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.8
85% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 712 704 687 691 685 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,478
Write 1,646
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 718
360% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 74.4
250% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 888
655% 867 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 259%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$368
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 472 474 481 478 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 467
SusWrite 476
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 58
192% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 125%
Great: 137%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$50
503GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 96 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 94.9
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 167 175 176 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 106
Write 144
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 171
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80%
Great: 90%
Seagate One Touch Hub 16TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0064
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 238
Write 209
Mixed 149
148% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 1
1,308% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 0.2
27% 5.93 MB/s
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 163
Mixed 101
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
779% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB
2999, 2999, 2999, 2999 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 31
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 27
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 72.3" 2560 1440 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical Z490 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $866
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback