Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 5405U 963 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 48.2 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 98.5 37% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 164 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1 Parallax 3.1 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 5.2 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Aarvex 512GB 2.5 SATA SSD 512GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 90 254 314 221 244 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 325 Write 267 Mixed 243 SusWrite 231 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 12.5 56% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 73.9 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 43.5 58% 102 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 2 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	38	60	15.5"	1366 768	AUO81EC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	20x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	15x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	11x

SSD
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GBUmisBench 158%, 5,615 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	9x
RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1x8GBRamaxelBench 48%, 2,184 samples	9x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	9x