HP 245 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 245 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 879E
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Memory 12.3
1-Core 20
2-Core 62.4
16% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 46.1
8% 57.3 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 879E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12044.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8S1S3128K-AH 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 221 288 289 86 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 296
Write 277
Mixed 226
SusWrite 208
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 18.7
52% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 135
99% 130 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 11.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 2.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 383
10% 383 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 7% 14 21 2 60 14" 1296 759 LGD06F0
Typical 245 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback