Tarox Midrange Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemTarox Midrange Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z390M-PLUS
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 179
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 783
81% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.95
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 90
Parallax 83.6
66% 84.8 fps
MRender 86
Gravity 87.3
Splatting 92.8
73% 88.7 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 366 346 350 348 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 466
Mixed 431
SusWrite 338
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 51.6
172% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
351GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 871 880 893 919 924 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 528
Mixed 825
SusWrite 852
195% 876 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 56.9
207% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 216
273% 467 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 13.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 35 60 31.5" 1280 720 WOR3290 Terra 3290W
Typical Midrange Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Tarox Midrange Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback