Tarox Midrange Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemTarox Midrange Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z390M-PLUS
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 970
92% 761 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.95
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.6% Good
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 89
Parallax 82.2
66% 84.2 fps
MRender 85.8
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 93.3
73% 88.9 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 377 354 340 345 345 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 467
Mixed 446
SusWrite 348
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.5
171% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
351GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 899 928 911 940 935 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1014
Write 922
Mixed 871
SusWrite 886
208% 923 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.3
232% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 221
246% 393 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 188%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 64GB
2733, 2733, 2733, 2733 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 WOR3290 Terra 3290W
Typical Midrange Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Tarox Midrange Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback