HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 22:23
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 156
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 263
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 1596) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 47.3
39% 49.5 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 45
Splatting 43.3
40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 152 125 253 405 596 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 728
Write 657
Mixed 516
SusWrite 335
125% 559 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 27.2
82% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 392
268% 333 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 333%
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
215GB free
Firmware: X6105101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 209 195 197 198 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 342
Write 341
Mixed 260
SusWrite 206
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 19.4
54% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 221
172% 237 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 135 134 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 108
Write 132
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 133
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
258GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 69 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 50.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 69.7
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 17% 30 130 25 60 7.2" 1296 759 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback