Lenovo 81UT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81UT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User OMN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 129
54% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.37 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.8
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZEB-MN52 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0523B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 886 913 951 969 956 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 296
Mixed 526
SusWrite 895
133% 589 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 10.9
65% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 251
201% 280 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 112%
Great: 211%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
689GB free
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 119 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 100
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 117
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C22-8GRS Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 4R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 38% 34 231 181 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15F5
Typical 81UT Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81UT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback