MSI Z97I GAMING AC (MS-7920)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7920
MotherboardMSI Z97I GAMING AC (MS-7920)  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 13:56
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 213
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 341
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 3308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
87% 107 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 104
Splatting 99.6
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 441
Mixed 388
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 53.7
179% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 265
201% 271 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
736GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 425 457 473 467 470 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 450
Mixed 416
SusWrite 430
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 53
176% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 358
250% 316 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
30GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.7
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
106% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 3R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 18% 71 214 58 60 24" 1280 720 AOC0001 G2460
Typical Z97I GAMING AC (MS-7920) Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI Z97I GAMING AC (MS-7920) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $862
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback