Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '23 at 12:23
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 125 56% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 389 36% 304 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 62.3 Reflection 73.1 Parallax 86.3 51% 73.9 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 45.5 45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 68 6.1 12 65 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.7% Poor	Read 239 Write 218 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 74.7 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 478GB 2,073 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 41GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 214 225 223 229 234 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 200 Write 99.1 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 221 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 10.1 41% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 14.1 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 104%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 718GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 122 119 121 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 158 Write 136 Mixed 83 SusWrite 120 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-095.A00G 2x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 17.4 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 13.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	100	24.5"	1280 720	HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	380x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16