Medion MD34030/2516

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MD34030/2516  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P2A4-EM
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 10:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 632
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 2GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 32.7
20% 28.3 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 20
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 159 188 191 192 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 413
Write 186
Mixed 176
SusWrite 183
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 8.9
56% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 14.5
34% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
537GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 166 172 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 159
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 170
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 5R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 42% 12 185 10 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0B43 S24D300
Typical MD34030/2516 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34030/2516

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback