Oegstone Q170M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Oegstone Q170M-C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 203 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 547 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 39.4 Parallax 37.2 29% 37.3 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 26.6 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB 2,468 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPC0012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 347 345 149 146 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 454 Write 332 Mixed 379 SusWrite 238 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 32.2 119% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 303 214% 269 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 94%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 931GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 92 89 84 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 62.2 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 86.3 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMUA5110MH78HAF-2666 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 20.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 20.3 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 0P 3R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	16%	98	204	32	60	23"	1920 1080	DEL4099 DELL P2314H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q170M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	14x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	14x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	13x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	13x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GBCrucialBench 92%, 1,497 samples	3x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 83%, 16,678 samples	4x
9905678-023.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,792 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 93%, 1,595 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $153

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16