HP p6-2312es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2312es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 47.5
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 39.6
23% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 40.9
6% 41.7 Pts
64-Core 38.4
2% 38.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 102 104 93 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 111
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 102
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Ramaxel RMR5040MM58F9F1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback