Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	Memory 55 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 19.3 29% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 23.7 8-Core 21.7 3% 22.7 Pts	64-Core 35 2% 35 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 54GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 39GB free Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 11 11 12 12 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	3.83% Terrible	Read 57.7 Write 28 Mixed 36 SusWrite 12.5 7% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 3% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 292%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 86GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 14 15 14 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 107 Write 32.2 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 15.5 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	3	2	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16