TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_K5504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_K5504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K5504VA
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 05:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 71.2
1-Core 192
2-Core 354
107% 206 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,076
109% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,679
104% 1,679 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 115%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 29AD) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3962
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 28.8
20% 27.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 21.9
21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 20.4%
 Great: 23%
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
MSI(1462 5138)
CLim: 3345 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 272
Parallax 308
240% 291 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 253
Splatting 198
210% 266 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 204%
 Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
600GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 1394 877 732 396 611 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,313
Write 1,958
Mixed 1,221
SusWrite 737
295% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 59.1
210% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 648
478% 643 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 191%
 Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 59.4
MC Mixed 49.3
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 25
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 137%
 Great: 141%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 15.5" 1920 1080 SDC4180
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_K5504VA Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_K5504VA

CPU
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples36x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples7x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples43x
RTX 4070Nvidia  $550Bench 190%, 45,585 samples1x
SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples27x
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TBNvmeBench 213%, 22 samples4x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBNvmeBench 172%, 2,910 samples4x
RAM
8x2GBMicronBench 117%, 968 samples21x
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GBHynixBench 118%, 2,587 samples21x
8x1GBMicronBench 115%, 283 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback