Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 04:10
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 74.7
43% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 386
34% 289 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 194 195 195 199 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 421
Write 400
Mixed 307
SusWrite 204
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 26
86% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 233
178% 240 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 93 85 65 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63% Good
Read 130
Write 74.5
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 89.1
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 89 89 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 59.6
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 88.9
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 67%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
809GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 95 105 102 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 123
Write 35.6
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 95.8
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 85%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 96 95 98 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 101
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 98.1
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.4
367% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2493 VE247
Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback