HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C1
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 177
57% 105 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 144
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Frontech 128GB 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2208XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 134 68 165 123 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 922
Write 120
Mixed 537
SusWrite 123
93% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 10.5
72% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 123
114% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: RTM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 97 114 114 108 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 79
Write 102
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 109
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310NA86H9F-2666 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 5.9
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 1.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 15.5" 1366 715 AUO71EC
Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback