Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 67
2-Core 127
57% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 187
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 31.8
22% 30 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 34.3
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 158
Write 93.7
Mixed 102
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 12.4
70% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 27
29% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
899GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 179
Mixed 158
127% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.3
137% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 109%
JetFlash TS256MJF120 0GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.83% Terrible
Read 9.26
Write 7.92
Mixed 5.58
9% 7.59 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.21
32% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback