Lenovo 90G80090UK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90G80090UK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36C5
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171005
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 69%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 483
47% 388 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 3.3
17% 17.4 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 12%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 291 311 310 311 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 284
Write 286
Mixed 246
SusWrite 300
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 23.8
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 276
224% 318 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
725GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 162 161 168 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 128
Write 115
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 164
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 115
SusWrite 96.6
137% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.3
97% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 20.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 14 60 24" 1280 720 ACR079C QG241Y
Typical 90G80090UK Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90G80090UK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback