User System

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 177 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 731 65% 551 Pts	64-Core 820 51% 820 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3300 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.4% Good	Lighting 82.3 Reflection 78.6 Parallax 72.9 67% 77.9 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 61.5 62% 78.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB 1,541 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 364 361 360 327 270 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 434 Write 378 Mixed 309 SusWrite 337 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 7.6 80% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 12.4 64% 143 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 95%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 92 89 114 107 110 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.7% Above average	Read 253 Write 139 Mixed 202 SusWrite 104 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 31.5 110% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 119 89% 117 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 781GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 179 180 179 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 168 Mixed 104 SusWrite 179 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 109%
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.5 5.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 100 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 6.4 24% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CRC 4x4GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	116% Outstanding	MC Read 52.5 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 43.2 132% 46.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 17.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	60	21.5"	1280 720	BNQ78DB BenQ GW2270

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16