User System

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 185 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 730 65% 550 Pts	64-Core 820 51% 820 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.6% Very good	Lighting 90.9 Reflection 89.2 Parallax 82.3 74% 87.5 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 71.7 70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB 1,541 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 362 77 294 280 288 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 428 Write 380 Mixed 320 SusWrite 275 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 8.8 88% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 12 37% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 95%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 102 104 112 101 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 303 Write 156 Mixed 199 SusWrite 106 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 33.2 116% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 80.4 74% 112 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 781GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 176 179 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 161 Mixed 106 SusWrite 177 118% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.4 6.6 5.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 100 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 6.3 23% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CRC 4x4GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	116% Outstanding	MC Read 52.2 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 42.7 132% 46.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	21.5"	1280 720	BNQ78DB BenQ GW2270

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16