bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 113
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 265
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 460
Asus(1043 04B4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 34.2
20% 29.4 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 26.5
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 201 197 216 235 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 134
Write 97.1
Mixed 81
SusWrite 215
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 10.6
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
246GB free
Firmware: SAN20102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 201 205 222 233 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 249
Write 233
Mixed 233
SusWrite 217
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 25.5
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 111
107% 169 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61%
Great: 102%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00WN4A0 1TB
227GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 56.4
Write 24.9
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 23.1
37% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.1
71% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
20GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.9 7.2 8.3 7.3 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 62.5
Write 17.7
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 8
28% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston termiter9.A01LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 0" 1360 768 ___0000 MS82
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback