Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer PI411
Memory	7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '23 at 11:42
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 12,809 User benchmarks, average bench 78% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 69.8 1-Core 152 2-Core 297 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 798 82% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 2014) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.8% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 161 Parallax 99.2 91% 124 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 108 Splatting 104 97% 120 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 127%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 Enclosure 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 579GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 296 306 301 284 310 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.2% Good	Read 330 Write 304 Mixed 276 SusWrite 300 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 24.1 81% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 213 147% 182 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.8 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	14"	1707 960	TMX1400 TL140BDXP02-0

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900HXAMDBench 78%, 12,809 samples	457x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	189x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	170x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	65x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	282x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	111x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	18x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	295x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16