Lenovo 3209N6M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3209N6M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 88
2-Core 178
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 308
42% 309 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 400 419 403 437 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 347
Write 407
Mixed 372
SusWrite 414
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 40.1
128% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 158
176% 299 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
426GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 133 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 133
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030KD68F9F1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 47 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2470 2470W
Typical 3209N6M Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209N6M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback