HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 885F
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 04:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 779
78% 632 Pts
64-Core 1027
64% 1027 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 885F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.6
5% 8 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.9
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1506 1549 1583 1471 1463 1296 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,559
Mixed 1,371
SusWrite 1,478
361% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 36.6
174% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 579
488% 702 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 257%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.5% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 15.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback