Acer TMP255-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Acer TMP255-M (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer BA50_HW
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '23 at 15:13
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030U 24,177 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 50.7 2-Core 83.3 47% 70.5 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 128 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0775) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.69% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 2 Parallax 5.1 2% 3.37 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 150 152 151 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 454 Write 153 Mixed 178 SusWrite 150 51% 234 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 25.9 98% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 147 122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E2 2x4GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 12.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	58	38	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15BE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TMP255-M Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer TMP255-M

CPU
Pentium 3556UIntelBench 44%, 1,741 samples	14x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	11x
Core i3-4010UIntel $280Bench 44%, 12,162 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	22x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	16x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	2x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16