Acer Aspire ES1-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-572  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer T-Rex_SK
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 21:15
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 64
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 79
39% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 140
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.9
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SD Ultra 3D 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52046100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 83 129 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 359
Write 143
Mixed 211
SusWrite 118
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 7.1
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 27.8
34% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 42 7 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE06BA
Typical Aspire ES1-572 Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback