Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 UD AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 15:12
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 170
2-Core 319
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 919
88% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 175
Parallax 171
162% 182 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
124% 157 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 139%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
77GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,870
Write 2,032
Mixed 1,663
415% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62.9
212% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,431
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 1,081
833% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
PSSD256GBQSU2-E7 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 150 99 102 100 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 476
Write 402
Mixed 402
SusWrite 150
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 1.9
82% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 15.8
69% 149 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 74%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 992 1000 992 960 903 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,348
Write 2,096
Mixed 2,099
SusWrite 1,013
424% 1,889 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 92.8
303% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,100
835% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 301%
Great: 410%
Pcie SSD 1TB
34GB free
Firmware: ECFM53.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,187
Write 1821
Mixed 1,213
317% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.6
197% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 927
683% 886 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 438%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
130GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 88.9
Write 95.3
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 78.5
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 34.6
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 17.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 11% 93 533 437 240 27.3" 1280 720 DEL42A7 DELL G2723H
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B
Typical GA-Z690 UD AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 2,899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback