Besstar UM700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBesstar UM700  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM700
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 04:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 166
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 385
42% 330 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 18.9
11% 14.2 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 10.5
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 512GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 532 287 286 285 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,086
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 447
207% 920 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 35.1
119% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 305
224% 296 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K2A-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 31.5" 1296 759 ONN0055 onn. TV
Typical UM700 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback