TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive434% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 823
83% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 85.3%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 204
Parallax 192
173% 203 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 146%
 Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1418 3227 2184 1111 1259 1270 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 4,330
Write 4529
Mixed 3,240
SusWrite 1,745
776% 3,461 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 89.1
322% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,356
DQ Write 1155
DQ Mixed 1,324
974% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 251% ↑
This bench: 434%
 Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 30.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 30
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC0437 VX2458-mhd
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1,280x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples1,047x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples971x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples659x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples619x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples419x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples449x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples295x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples226x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples238x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples137x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback