Asrock X99 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 661
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 400D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 154
Parallax 151
125% 153 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 133
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1678 1642 1586 1537 1482 1477 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 2,050
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 1,567
422% 1,881 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 60.1
192% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 451
327% 429 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 263%
Great: 410%
ST16000NM000J-2T 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 193 192 191 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 193
Write 195
Mixed 177
SusWrite 191
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 1.1
80% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
3% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
106GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 460 461 461 457 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 462
Mixed 349
SusWrite 459
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 39.6
135% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 172
180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 116%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
629GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 145 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 88.3
Mixed 113
SusWrite 144
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 25
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 23.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 8 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0A28 S24C300
Typical X99 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback