Gigabyte GA-Q170M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q170M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 22:30
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 340
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 51.2
42% 52.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 49
Splatting 45.5
42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA2000CM10003 2TB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STZSE015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 337 338 374 125 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 442
SusWrite 263
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 43.5
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 369
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 135%
Fanxiang S101 2TB
110GB free
Firmware: SN12574
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 338 332 229 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 419
Write 447
Mixed 401
SusWrite 198
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 35.6
125% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 80.5
109% 199 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79%
Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 427
Mixed 367
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 38.1
128% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 351
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
32GB free
Firmware: 4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 284
Write 93.2
Mixed 168
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 11.7
51% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 32.8
60% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 90.9
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 103
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 21.9" 1280 720 BBY0019 NS19D220NA16A
Typical GA-Q170M-D3H Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q170M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback