Gmktec NucBox9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGmktec NucBox9  (all builds)
MotherboardGMKtec GMKtec
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221021
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 19:17
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 56
1-Core 156
2-Core 293
87% 168 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 690
77% 604 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 24.2
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 20.1
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb SSD 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10096
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1653 209 206 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 654
331% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 64.1
219% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 486
390% 531 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-3200ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 21
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM08E9 S24B240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback