Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA DESKTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 12:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 355
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220
XFX(1682 5220) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hi-level Elite Series 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 157 6.6 292 107 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 494
Write 412
Mixed 405
SusWrite 158
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 29.2
136% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 10.1
75% 168 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
463GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 37 75 27" 1920 1080 CAP2413 CSPE23-C238F
Typical NIRVANA DESKTOP Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback