MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 11:42
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 653
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 179
Parallax 172
157% 181 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1656
Write 1460
Mixed 1117
314% 1411 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 27.9
163% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 513
461% 692 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 244%
Aarvex 128GB 2.5 SATA SSD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: V0218A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 364
Mixed 376
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 29.2
137% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 41.3
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
149GB free
Firmware: SC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 39.2
40% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
118GB free
Firmware: JC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,850
Write 20
Mixed 31.6
930% 1,301 MB/s
4K Read 672
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
28,086% 224 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB
96GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.8
Write 7.5
Mixed 13.9
17% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
85% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 12%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
27GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.5
Write 19.8
Mixed 17.2
32% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
105% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5842 D2342P
Typical H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 1,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback