Packard Easynote ENTG71BM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard Easynote ENTG71BM (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard Easynote ENTG71BM
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '23 at 03:09
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 44.8 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 43.2 25% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 43 8-Core 43 6% 43 Pts	64-Core 42.9 3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0937) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB 12,292 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 139 64 104 71 118 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.9% Average	Read 159 Write 197 Mixed 133 SusWrite 110 34% 149 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 28.8 96% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 109 83% 111 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	18	15	60	15.5"	1366 768	LGD0456

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Easynote ENTG71BM Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote ENTG71BM

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	33x
Celeron N2940IntelBench 33%, 3,995 samples	8x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	53x
Atom Processor E3800 Series/Celeron Processor N2920/J1900IntelBench 1%, 300 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	2x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	32x
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GBKingstonBench 17%, 2,515 samples	4x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 7,765 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16