Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory90.5 GB free of 96 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KS-$580
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 252
2-Core 498
142% 278 Pts
4-Core 941
8-Core 1,885
167% 1,413 Pts
64-Core 4,389
272% 4,389 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 131%
Great: 138%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Gigabyte(1458 40C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 49%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2462 2480 1895 1608 1616 1610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 2769
Write 2,530
Mixed 1,981
SusWrite 1,945
518% 2,306 MB/s
4K Read 77.2
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 113
411% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 2,268
DQ Write 2,009
DQ Mixed 2,068
1,570% 2,115 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 451%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 474 474 474 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 485
Mixed 456
SusWrite 474
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 67.4
226% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
2.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 474 474 473 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 485
Mixed 421
SusWrite 473
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 66.5
223% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 474 474 474 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 485
Mixed 458
SusWrite 474
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 67.8
226% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 474 474 474 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 484
Mixed 459
SusWrite 474
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 68.5
228% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK96GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 77.5
MC Write 74.4
MC Mixed 70.7
212% 74.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 54.1
SC Mixed 33.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACR048E XB271HK
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback