Lenovo 20UN00FVUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20UN00FVUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20UN00FVUS
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1180G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 37.7
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 132
46% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 269
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 22C7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 16.4
10% 15.9 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 13.3
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM512GD3HX015N 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41040C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 582 527 790 668 813 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 735
Write 484
Mixed 916
SusWrite 657
157% 698 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 47
157% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 324
234% 307 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 132%
Great: 281%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
19GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 13 15 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 270
Write 23
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 19.7
69% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 9.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 12.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13" 1280 720 LEN4077
Typical 20UN00FVUS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20UN00FVUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback