Lenovo 10AXS3JD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AXS3JD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 10:36
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1840T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 87.9
45% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 94.8
13% 94.8 Pts
64-Core 90.7
6% 90.7 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3
1% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTP256GSSD1 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0409A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 166 199 331 320 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 357
Write 300
Mixed 261
SusWrite 274
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 16.8
78% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 68.7
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 35.8
55% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 42 0 32" 1280 720 MTC0B01 MTC26T42
Typical 10AXS3JD00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AXS3JD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback