Colorful H310M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Colorful H310M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful H310M-E
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210720
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '23 at 06:03
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$62 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 185 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 278 35% 267 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 85.3 52% 70.9 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 73 Splatting 47.4 49% 62 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen03sm22ar128sdk 128GB 128GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0111A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 44 58 60 54 68 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 487 Write 394 Mixed 408 SusWrite 79 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 26.8 123% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 44.4 82% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 166GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 71 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 72.8 Write 69.3 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 70.3 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 0A94 D4R4GL24A8R 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.7 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 15.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	54	22	75	0.7"	1920 1080	DSG1919 PF24HD SUPER

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-E Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Colorful H310M-E

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	3x
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	2x
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
256GB 256GBRX7Bench 63%, 50 samples	2x
128GB 128GBV-gen03sm22ar128sdkBench 69%, 39 samples	2x
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $76Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	2x

RAM
D4H4GL26A8TS5 2x4GBUnknownBench 82%, 43 samples	3x
CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 0A94 D4R4GL24A8R 12GBUnknownBench 47%, 2 samples	2x
Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $33Bench 74%, 14,163 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16