Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 18:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 147
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 226
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 9.2
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.1
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 124 121 133 116 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 413
Write 159
Mixed 303
SusWrite 120
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 1.1
59% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 23.2
44% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1366 745 BOE066E
Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback