Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 15:30
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 126
58% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 399
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 65.7
56% 68.3 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 64
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 158 83 76 47 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 458
Write 400
Mixed 323
SusWrite 122
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 17.2
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 144
120% 178 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
BT58SSD08S 128GB
33GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 9.2 56 26 68 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 360
Write 308
Mixed 244
SusWrite 44.8
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 11.4
69% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 12.8
21% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
173GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 353 17 6.5 32 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 417
Write 358
Mixed 136
SusWrite 123
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.1
4% 9.57 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 1866 CL10 Ser Samsung Samsung 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 14.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback