Supermicro X9SCV-Q/X9SCV-QV4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X9SCV-Q/X9SCV-QV4  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SCV-Q/QV4
Memory4.6 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 12:40
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2510E
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 87.5
48% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 153
18% 143 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE2NV153T8 15.5TB
14.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8DV10560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 645 705 586 645 683 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.1% Excellent
Read 269
Write 905
Mixed 409
SusWrite 675
129% 564 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 14.3
67% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 274
215% 302 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 186%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Winbond 25X/Q Series 8GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 19 32 0" 1280 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback