Asus H81M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-D  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 139
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 268
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 120 135 73 74 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 391
Write 169
Mixed 192
SusWrite 102
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 23.1
78% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 151
107% 136 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
384GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 102
128% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%
WD Multimedia 0622 1TB
303GB free, PID 0622
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 35 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 28
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 36.4
47% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 36 60 21.5" 1920 1017 BNQ7887 BenQ GL2240
Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback