Asus H81M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-D  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 269
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 64 62 72 60 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 124
Write 152
Mixed 147
SusWrite 69.1
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 28.5
85% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 102
86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
384GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 102 99 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 131
Write 135
Mixed 20
SusWrite 102
125% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 52%
WD Multimedia 0622 1TB
303GB free, PID 0622
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 35 36 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 53.4
Write 32.6
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 36.3
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 37 60 21.5" 1920 1017 BNQ7887 BenQ GL2240
Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback