HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory4.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 140-$9
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 32.4
1-Core 5.7
2-Core 11.4
13% 16.5 Pts
4-Core 14
8-Core 9.2
2% 11.6 Pts
64-Core 10.4
1% 10.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Sanyo(144D 8097) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.6
2% 2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC7110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 116 125 94 109 122 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 133
SusWrite 111
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 6.2
23% 8.47 MB/s
DQ Read 59.8
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 56.8
43% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
354GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 88 94 77 81 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 94.4
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 84.7
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 31 52 39 60 24" 1920 1057 ACR0338 B246HL
Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback