Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 53
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 607
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13FC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.9% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 68
65% 84.1 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 61.1
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1257 1245 1360 673 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,897
Write 1,355
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 966
292% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 73.9
256% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 403
330% 465 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 237%
Great: 297%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
389GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 16
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 16.9
35% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 13.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 46 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback