Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive593% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230613
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 18:57
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 236
2-Core 460
136% 262 Pts
4-Core 884
8-Core 1,642
151% 1,263 Pts
64-Core 4,185
259% 4,185 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Zotac(19DA 4675) ≥ 4GB; ZOTAC RTX 4090 Extreme AIRO
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 468
Reflection 646
Parallax 584
381% 566 fps
Gravity 579
Splatting 288
363% 433 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G4x4 NVMe 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4577 5010 4430 4812 4893 4854 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
593% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 4,627
Mixed 2,649
SusWrite 4,762
829% 3,640 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 302
4K Mixed 107
384% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 1940
DQ Write 1,787
DQ Mixed 1926
1,428% 1,884 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 593%
Great: 593%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G4x4 NVMe 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,065
Write 3,470
Mixed 2,143
577% 2,559 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 87
321% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,040
DQ Write 2,018
DQ Mixed 2,143
1,579% 2,067 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 490%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
927GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,117
Write 2,882
Mixed 2,302
547% 2,434 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 83.4
316% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,977
DQ Write 1,982
DQ Mixed 2,001
1,498% 1,987 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
8TB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 205
Write 215
Mixed 101
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
834% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
119GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 24.4
Mixed 20.9
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4
263% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
217% Outstanding
MC Read 91.1
MC Write 85.1
MC Mixed 83.3
247% 86.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 36
105% 36.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 217%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 32" 1280 720 SPT13C5 Sceptre W50
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback