Lenovo 0385A95

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 0385A95  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory14.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 03:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User TGO-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 443
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3470
AMD(1002 0B42) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.5
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 71 54 61 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 353
Write 83
Mixed 119
SusWrite 77.7
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 20
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 61.6
83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: SBM3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 56.5
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.2
132% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
13GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 149 106 113 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 123
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
28GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 91 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 97.1
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
41GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 68.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 32.8
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
183% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
2GB free
Firmware: GKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 34 34 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 50
Write 40
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 34.5
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 Adata 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 22 60 20.7" 1280 720 HWP328F HP V212a
Typical 0385A95 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 0385A95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback