Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 291
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,156
102% 867 Pts
64-Core 2,062
128% 2,062 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 212
Parallax 206
195% 219 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 142
Splatting 126
130% 165 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 159%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 1TB
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1833 1663 1900 1917 1919 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 1,710
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 1,819
350% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 67.8
189% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 875
658% 866 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 264%
Great: 308%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
601GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 92 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 110
SusWrite 98.2
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 207 195 207 209 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 150
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 206
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
793GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 35 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 55.4
Write 32
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 38.2
46% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 74.7
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 35.2
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 33.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 130%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 13 216 60 144 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical GA-B550 GAMING X V2 Builds (Compare 4,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback