Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 208% UFO	Desktop 113% UFO	Workstation 245% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	48.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230518
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '23 at 02:13
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$309 2,844 User benchmarks, average bench 116% AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Memory 70.6 1-Core 207 2-Core 415 118% 231 Pts	4-Core 810 8-Core 1496 138% 1,153 Pts	64-Core 2,673 165% 2,673 Pts
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 126%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Zotac(19DA 1612) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	190% Outstanding	Lighting 275 Reflection 254 Parallax 283 224% 271 fps	MRender 320 Gravity 230 Splatting 173 189% 241 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB 17,374 User benchmarks, average bench 389% 681GB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2451 1461 1270 1378 1279 1245 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	369% Outstanding	Read 2,435 Write 3622 Mixed 1,787 SusWrite 1,514 528% 2,339 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 240 4K Mixed 91.8 326% 128 MB/s	DQ Read 2,048 DQ Write 1,482 DQ Mixed 1,778 1,325% 1,769 MB/s
Poor: 247% ↑ This bench: 369% Great: 573%
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 201GB free Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 161 86 142 195 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 405 Write 271 Mixed 237 SusWrite 176 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 18.7 62% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 45.5 44% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 59%
WD100EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 557GB free Firmware: 01.01R.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 126 123 119 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 125 Write 115 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 123 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 87%
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63 7,628 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 601GB free Firmware: GT001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 98 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 71.3 Write 82 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 98.5 49% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 192 188 189 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 126 Write 149 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 188 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 442GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 102 101 99 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 89.9 Write 93.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 99.7 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-DCLAR 4x16GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	121% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 42.9 124% 43.4 GB/s	SC Read 46.5 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 40.4 124% 43.3 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 200%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5BDF LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 417%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $329Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	36x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $259Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	31x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $309Bench 116%, 2,844 samples	18x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	12x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $660Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	10x
RX 7900-XTAMD $900Bench 220%, 6,228 samples	8x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	11x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $186Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	5x

RAM
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples	13x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GBGBench 193%, 4,084 samples	7x
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $2,236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16